Cases 11 - 20 of 289
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Compton Cowboys, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02642
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
Compton Cowboys, Inc., Israel Houghton, Jekalyn Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ollie v. Ek et al
as 4:2024cv04043
Plaintiff:
Robert Ollie, Jr
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Kurt Osmundson, D Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Tiamiyu et al
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Keenan Novon Anderson
Defendant:
Lukumon Tiamiyu, Maxwell Eke and Amber Ocoha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Eke
as 3:2024cv00031
Not Yet Classified:
Paul C Eke
Petitioner:
Paul Eke
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
EK Ekcessories v. National Industries for the Blind
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
EK Ekcessories
Defendant:
for the Blind National Industries
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Mabry v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02007
Plaintiff:
Devon Carl Mabry
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Jennifer Chacon, Jonathan Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Ek et al
as 2:2023cv02277
Plaintiff:
Aaron Stewart, Jr
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Felicia Adkins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Sharp et al
as 4:2023cv04767
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Lynn Sharp, Amber Ochoa, William J Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOKSU v. QUICK MART FOOD STORE EK INC. et al
as 2:2023cv22471
Plaintiff:
ILHAN GOKSU
Defendant:
QUICK MART FOOD STORE EK INC. doing business as QUICK MART FOOD & BLIMPIE, EYYUP ARGA and KADIR KURT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Dunlap v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Dunlap
Defendant:
John Doe, Ashtyn Rennels, Michell Babb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
