Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Roy v. United States Government et al
as 4:2012cv02372
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
United States Government, Turabo University, Kolkali University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamal Roy v. USA Govt, et al
as 12-2586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
USA GOVT, FACEBOOK, et al. and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Roy v. USA
as 1:2012fp00166
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamal Roy v. USA, et al
as 12-1686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION and others
Roy v. NY Department of Licensing Nursing et al
as 1:2011fp00452
Defendant:
NY Department of Licensing Nursing, B. H. Obama, The Associated Press, New York City and others
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy v. USA Govt. et al
as 5:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
USA Govt., All States of USA, Associated Press Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roy v. Obama et al
as 4:2011cv04036
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
Michelle Obama, Barack Obama and Eric Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamal Roy v. USA, et al
as 10-56507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOWN OF HARRIET, NY, DAVID ATDSIL and others
Kamal Roy v. Carol Delaney, et al
as 10-56013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROL DELANEY, R.S, RN, Director of Nursing at Mercy of Northern New York, MURHPY, Executive Officer at Mercy of Northern New York, PETROSKI, Director of Personnel at Mercy of Northern New York and others
Roy v. Unknown Defendants
as 2:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
