Cases 11 - 20 of 1,183,395
Jenkins v. Temple Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jamall Jenkins
Defendant:
Temple Police Department, Bell County District Attorney and Bell County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Wayne Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ussery v. Law Office of Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Roger Ussery
Defendant:
Law Office of Public Defender and Kelly Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheikhuna v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Awes Sheikhuna
Defendant:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. USA
as 6:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Romelia Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McGee v. Andrews et al
as 5:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Terry Andrews, E.R. Delta 4 Bunk 47, Walle Delta 4 bunk 41 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
William H. Caruthers
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department, Officer Perez, Officer Morbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Crout et al
as 7:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Eric Crout, Kristen Haight and Chad Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
