Cases 21 - 30 of 180
Jones v. Uttecht
as 3:2022cv05371
Plaintiff:
Martin Arthur Jones and Martin A Jones
Defendant:
Jeffrey Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. FPI Management Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00336
Defendant:
Mehrdad Rahimzadeh, FPI Management Inc, Cindy Hager and others
Plaintiff:
Henry James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Copple et al v. Arthur J Gallagher & Co et al
as 2:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Matthew Copple, Justin Ward, Jeremy Fischer and others
Defendant:
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (Illinois), Arthur J. Gallagher Service Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanson v. Safeway Inc
as 2:2021cv01641
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hanson
Defendant:
Safeway Inc. and Safeway Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mendez v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
Arthur J Mendez, Jr
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Van Ogle et al
as 3:2021cv05818
Plaintiff:
Christopher Arthur Miller
Defendant:
Dan Van Ogle, Jeneva Cotton, Scott Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington Election Integrity Coalition United et al v. Fell et al
as 2:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
Washington Election Integrity Coaltion United, Arthur Coday, Jr., Thomas J Prettyman and others
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Garth Fell and Does 1-30
Intervenor Defendant:
Washington State Democratic Central Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bungie Inc v. Elite Boss Tech Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01112
Defendant:
Officer, LPD John Doe 1, Officer, LPD John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bungie, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Bungie Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.