Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Chambers v. Trammell et al
as 6:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Timothy Chambers
Defendant:
Anita Trammell, Robert Patton, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Trammell et al
as 5:2014cv01343
Plaintiff:
Timothy Chambers
Defendant:
Anita Trammell, Robert Patton, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lord v. Urban et al
as 5:2013cv00340
Plaintiff:
Darrell William Lord
Defendant:
R. Urban, FNU Ford, FNU Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Lord v. R. Urben, et al
as 5:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lord
Defendant:
R Urben, FNU Reed, FNU Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Lynch et al
as 6:2012cv00063
Defendant:
Corporal FNU Brazil, Jail Administrator John Kolinek, Sheriff Larry Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gammaro v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gammaro
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Edwin G. Buss, R. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy Turner, IV v. John Doe, et al
as 11-1272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Guy O. Turner, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
John Doe, employed at State Justice Bureau, Tom Reddin, Major at Boone County Sheriff Department, Nicole LNU, employed as Boone County sheriff personnel and others
Nashaddai v. Slaughter et al
as 8:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Nydeed B.K. Nashaddai
Defendant:
FNU Slaughter, Jim Coats, Daniel G. Simovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Lowell C.I.Pharmacy et al
as 5:2010cv00557
Plaintiff:
Donald Hunter
Defendant:
Lowell C.I.Pharmacy and FNU Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. States Justice Bureau, et al
as 4:2010cv00701
Plaintiff:
Guy O. Turner, IV
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Reddin, Nicole LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
