Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Barker et al
as 9:2018cv00179
Petitioner:
Paul Kenny, Chuck Fyfe, Travis Hill and others
Respondent:
Selway Corportaion Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Selway Corporation
Intervenor:
Max Downing
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hill v. LLR et al
as 4:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hill
Defendant:
LULAROE, LLR and LLR Inc., d/b/a LuLaRoe doing business as LuLaRoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harteis v. Dr. Hill et al
as 6:2018cv00066
Defendant:
Dr. Hill and Dr. Kolowkowski
Plaintiff:
Jacob Harteis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Mountain View Pizza Co. et al
as 1:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Mike Anderson
Defendant:
Mountain View Pizza Co. , Black Hills Pizza, Inc. and Choose the Right Pizza, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Spencer v. Hill et al
as 6:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Virginia Hill, Steven Palmeri, Lori Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Thompson et al
as 9:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Myers
Defendant:
Shaun R. Thompson, Jon G. Moog, Mitchell D. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Berryhill
as 9:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Katherine Marie Hill
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Debuf et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Defendant:
Hill
Plaintiff:
Debuf and Russell Debuf
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Taurus J. Hill, Pacific West Construction, Inc and Pacific West Construction of Montana, Inc
3Rd Party Defendant:
Nathan Ryan Debuf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marten v. Justad, M.D. et al
as 6:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ellen Marten
Defendant:
Jean Justad, M.D. , South Hills Internal Medicine Associates , Gene Haire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weeks v. Johnson et al
as 9:2016cv00161
Plaintiff:
Candi-Lee; weeks
Defendant:
Bradley F. Johnson, Bill Dial, Kristi Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
