Cases 21 - 30 of 718
Frisch et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv13157
Plaintiff:
Judy Frisch, John Howard and Joseph Kraker
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Zawideh v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 2:2023cv12993
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Zawideh
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. and Abbott Diabetes Care Sales Corp.
Interested Party:
Howard B. Goldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Lewis #607445 v. Howard et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Lewis #607745 and Troy Deon Lewis #607445, II
Defendant:
Jeffrey Howard and Patricia Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bean #253562 v. Howard
as 2:2023cv00214
Petitioner:
Rafeal Bean #253562
Respondent:
Jeff Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corps v. County of Ogemaw, Michigan et al
as 1:2023cv12724
Plaintiff:
Michael Corps
Defendant:
Ogemaw, County of, Brian Osier, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Linden v. St. Joseph, County of et al
as 1:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Howard Linden and Howard T. Linden
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ST. JOSEPH, Sgt. Cody Back, Cpt. Kitty Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canfield #978427 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Daniel Canfield #978427
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, J. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Macomb, County of
as 1:2023cv12595
Plaintiff:
Faytima Howard and Faytima Leak
Defendant:
Macomb County and Macomb, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
