Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Hassell v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00967
Plaintiff:
Melvin R. Hassell
Defendant:
Louise P Hytken, Ramonna Nottinger, Phil Umphress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devabhaktuni v. Ravi et al
as 3:2019cv02710
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, NQS, Rebecca Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Devabhaktuni v. Fish et al
as 3:2019cv02644
Defendant:
Medical City of Denton, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospitals Plano, Medical City of Dallas and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Devabhaktuni v. Boyle et al
as 3:2019cv02636
Defendant:
A Joe Fish, Custom Border Patrol and James Boyle
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hassell v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv02925
Defendant:
Louise P Hytken, Ramonna Nottinger, Phil Umphres and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray Hassell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn Winningham v. Donald Baker, et al
as 17-15243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN WINNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD BAKER, Deputy Clerk, DONALD B. VERILLI, Jr., Wrongdoer; US Solicitor General, ERIK FOSSUM, Wrongdoer; Deputy Clerk and others
Winningham v. Baker et al
as 2:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Defendant:
Donald Baker, Donald B Verilli, Jr., Erik Fossum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunter v. Fish
as 3:2016cv02285
Petitioner:
David Hunter
Respondent:
A Joe Fish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amrhein v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Amrhein
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Scarpa (Gregory Scarpa, Jr.)
as 16-303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Gregory Scarpa, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Granato, Joseph Savarese, Robert Zambardi, AKA Bobby Zam and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
