Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Klicos Painting Company, Inc. v. Saffo Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02505
Plaintiff:
Klicos Painting Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Saffo Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981
Spry (ID 64661) v. Saffo et al
as 5:2014cv03088
Plaintiff:
George Raymond Spry
Defendant:
Karl Saffo and (fnu) Corbier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cote (ID 62263) v. Dozier et al
as 5:2014cv03058
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Cote
Defendant:
Sue Ann Dozier, (fnu) Saffo, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Sobaski v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 13-3151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John T. Sobaski, also known as John T. Sobaski
Defendant - Appellee:
Correctional Medical Services, George A. Lombardi, Todaro and others
Saffo Contractors, Inc. v. United Builders Group, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Saffo Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
United Builders Group, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Wagner (ID 96234) vs. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2012cv03212
Plaintiff:
TyRon Wagner
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Karl Saffo, Ellen Bartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clyde Robinson v. Dr. Karl Saffo, et al
as 12-2529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clyde Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Karl Saffo
Defendant:
Brenda Shira, Jean Ann Johnson, Farnham and others
Peterson v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 4:2010cv01866
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Peterson
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Elizabeth Conley, William E. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
