Cases 21 - 30 of 306
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bryant v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Adrian Bryant
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bryant v. Buchholtz et al
as 3:2023cv00182
Petitioner:
Rocky J. Bryant
Respondent:
Peter Buchholtz, Monica Bonds, FNU Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02059
Petitioner:
Rocky J. Bryant
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NARCISSE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00251
Petitioner:
BRYANT RENE NARCISSE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bryant v. Parker et al
as 5:2023ct03027
Plaintiff:
Amarillo D. Bryant
Defendant:
Unit Manager Parker, Sgt. Watson and FTO Mr. McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Defendant:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, JEFF NIEMAN, KODY H. KINSLEY and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore and Philip E. Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
BRYANT v. USA
as 1:2022cv01045
Petitioner:
ANTONIO TOMAR BRYANT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bryant v. Rich et al
as 5:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Raekwon B. Bryant
Defendant:
Dam Rich, FNU Demvry, Marilyn E. Beazer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03416
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
FNU Cooper, FNU Gardner, FNU Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
