Cases 21 - 30 of 7,138
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hernandez-Graulau et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Nelson Hernandez-Graulau and Ana M Graulau-Collazo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pimental et al v. J.S. Helwig & Son, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03611
Plaintiff:
Cesar Dume Pimental, Ana Miguelina Pimental, Rosaury Dilone and others
Defendant:
J.S. Helwig & Son, LLC and Thomas Harold Reinert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Dos Santos Coutinho, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2961
Petitioner:
FABIO DOS SANTOS COUTINHO, ANA CAROLINE BRITOS SANTOS and ANA SOPHIA DOS SANTOS COUTINHO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
DE ARCHULETA et al v. VORO INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05943
Defendant:
VORO INC. doing business as VORO MOTORS also known as VORO MOTORS NYC, VORO MOTORS NYC and VORO MOTORS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANA DE ARCHULETA and TIMOTHY REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Roldan-Guaraca v. Garland
as 24-1244
Petitioner:
SEGUNDO OLMEDO ROLDAN-GUARACA, ANA LUCIA DAQUILEMA-PUCULPALA and THALIA ALEXANDRA ROLDAN-DAQUILEMA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
