Cases 21 - 30 of 126,306
Team Kennedy v. Berger et al
as 1:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
Team Kennedy
Defendant:
Henry T. Berger, Peter S. Kosinski, Essma Bagnuola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burris v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Anthony Burris
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sosa v. AT&T et al
as 3:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sosa
Defendant:
AT&T, Google, YouTube and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
IN RE AT&T SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 3:2024cv01196
Not Yet Classified:
AT&T Inc Securities Litigation
Plaintiff:
John Brazinsky, Teachers Retirement System of the City of New York, New York City Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, Randall L Stephenson, John T Stankey and others
Petitioner:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Bridget N Smagala Revocable Trust, Suresh Kodali and others
Stephens et al v. AT&T et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Raelun Stephens, Sr. and KR&R Appliance
Defendant:
AT&T and Automation Personnel Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Cutting Edge Vision, LLC
Defendant:
T Mobile US, Inc. and T Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ashley MaxwellIn re: Ashley Maxwell
as 24-50390
Petitioner:
In re: Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell, Mistie Sharp and others
Respondent:
Fund Texas Choice, North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Hall v. Treasurer of the United States, et al.
as 24-3199
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES, APPLE INC., T-MOBILE US, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
