Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Young et al v. Sproat et al
as 3:2015cv03332
Plaintiff:
Douglas Young and Coralie Brewer
Defendant:
Joshoua Sproat, Christopher Matoush, Jarman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RASHID MUHAMMAD v. RUPSKA et al
as 2:2015cv00228
Defendant:
HEATHER ATTERBURY, T. BAILEY, LIEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER BLILA and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Atterbury v. Groupe SEB USA, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01240
Plaintiff:
Diana Atterbury
Defendant:
Groupe SEB USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Atterbury v. United States Marshals Service
as 14-2805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen L. Atterbury
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Marshals Service, Gary Insley, Contracting Officer, Office of Security Contracts, Judicial Division, United States Marshals Service, in his individual capacity and John Doe, in his individual capacity
THOMPSON et al v. OFFICE OF THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2014cv00964
Defendant:
CAMP ATTERBURY, EDINBURGH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
KURTIS W. FINDLEY, ERIC L. REED and DANIEL D. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Danny Atterbury v. Denise Daly
as 12-17262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY F. ATTERBURY
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE DALY
Danny Atterbury v. Therese Varney, et al
as 12-17240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY F. ATTERBURY
Defendant - Appellee:
THERESE VARNEY, LORI BARLO, MARY MURTAGH and others
Atterbury v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 6:2012cv06245
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Gary Insley and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Atterbury
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Atterbury v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2012cv00502
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Gary Insley and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Atterbury
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
