Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Bell v. Santiago et al
as 4:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Bell
Defendant:
Frank Santiago, Daniel Craig, Iowa Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Santiago et al
as 1:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Bell
Defendant:
Frank Santiago, Daniel Craig, Iowa Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bell v. Bentzinger et al
as 1:2013cv01563
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Bell
Defendant:
Scott Bentzinger, Kelly Van Fleet and Jerry Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Harris v. Brett Huston, et al
as 13-2657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRETT HUSTON, KEITH DODD, MONTRELL CARTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Pippins v. KPMG LLP
as 13-889
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rehm, Anna Huang, Brian J. Cogley and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Lambert, Jamie Schindler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Kyle Pippins, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
KPMG LLP
Amicus Curiae:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Horace Bell v. G. Flippo, et al
as 12-16745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HORACE ANDREW BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
G. FLIPPO, C. SMITH, N. DILL and others
Harris v. Huston et al
as 2:2012cv00481
Plaintiff:
David W Harris
Defendant:
Brett Huston, Keith Dodd, Montell Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49091
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
