Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Martins et al v. Mickens
as 1:2018cv03615
Plaintiff:
Maria Martins and Antonio Martins
Defendant:
Shatima Mickens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MARTIN v. CREDITONE, LLC. et al
as 2:2018cv05878
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MARTIN
Defendant:
CREDITONE, LLC. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Antonio Hills
as 17-15045
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO MARTIN CAYASSO HILLS
US v. Steven Antonio Martin
as 17-4474
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN ANTONIO MARTIN, a/k/a Yola Red, a/k/a Billy Suwoo
Cayasso-Hills v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv10043
Plaintiff:
Antonio Martin Cayasso-Hills
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
White et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2017cv00097
Defendant:
Antonio Martin, National Indemnity of the South, Starlight Logistics Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas White and Tammy White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
White et al v. Martin et al
as 2:2017cv01496
Plaintiff:
Tammy White and Nicholas White
Defendant:
Antonio Martin , Star Light Logistics Corporation , Time Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sims et al v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv10767
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims, Burundi Antonio Martin, Larry D Woods and others
Defendant:
Cook County Illinois, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv02584
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MARTIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv02583
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MARTIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
