Cases 21 - 30 of 424
Meeks v. Hales et al
as 5:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Meeks
Defendant:
Christopher Hales, Town of Cameron and Cameron, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Southern Nevada Correctional Center et al
as 2:2022cv02021
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Jones
Defendant:
Southern Nevada Correctional Center, Sgt. Estell and Southern Nevada Correctional Center Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 22-2169
Petitioner:
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.
Respondent:
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Chandler v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02745
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Chandler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Arthur Chandler
as 22-5956
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE CHANDLER
Chandler v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50370
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Chandler
Respondent:
Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022at00789
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Lee v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Avis Arthur Lee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 22-2038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
