Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Williams v. Hobbs
as 5:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Phillip D Williams
Defendant:
Artis Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ziegenhorn et al
as 3:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Herbert D Ziegenhorn, Ziegenhorn Seed Farms Partnership, Fisher Seed Farms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2010cv00281
Plaintiff:
Corey Brian Sanders
Defendant:
Artis Ray Hobbs, John Whaley, Curtis Gibson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
Corey Brian Sanders
Defendant:
Artis Ray Hobbs, James Gibson, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Hobbs
as 5:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tonnie Brown, III
Defendant:
Artis Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sandlin v. Clemmons et al
as 2:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Sandlin
Defendant:
Faron R Clemmons, Artis Ray Hobbs, Moses Jackson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kawasaki Motors Finance Corporation v. Milam's Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00270
Plaintiff:
Kawasaki Motors Finance Corporation
Defendant:
Milam's Inc and Artie A Milam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mayo v. Norris et al
as 2:2009cv00088
Plaintiff:
Randy T Mayo
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Artis Ray Hobbs, Greg Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Norris et al
as 2:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
Randy T Mayo
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dennis Carnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Norris et al
as 2:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
Randy T Mayo
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dennis Carnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
