Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 96
EARLE ASPHALT CO. et al v. COUNTY OF ATLANTIC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv18355
Plaintiff: Earle Asphalt Co., Luis Silverio and Associated Builders and Contractors New Jersey Chapter
Defendant: County of Atlantic, South Jersey Building and Construction Trades Council, AFLCIO and SOUTH JERSEY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assoc Builders and Contractors, et al v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4083
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF ALABAMA, INC.
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Nevada Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. et al v. Walsh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00430
Plaintiff: Nevada Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., Associated Builders and Contractors Nevada Chapter and Nevada Trucking Association
Defendant: Marty Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., et al v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al
as 21-13910
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF ALABAMA, INC.
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Earle Asphalt Co. et al v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv11162
Defendant: CAMDEN COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, UNITED BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSERY, AFL-CIO and others
Plaintiff: LUIS SILVERIO, EARLE ASPHALY CO. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS NEW JERSEY CHAPTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coalition for Workforce Innovation et al v. Walsh et al
as 1:2021cv00130
Plaintiff: Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas, Coalition for Workforce Innovation, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. and others
Defendant: United States Department of Labor, Secretary Marty Walsh, Principal Deputy Adm Jessica Looman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of New York v. Scalia
as 20-3806
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant: Eugene Scalia, Esq., Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Labor and United States of America
Intervenor: American Lodging and Hotel Association, HR Policy Association, Associated Builders and Contractors and others
State of New York v. Scalia
as 20-3815
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Colorado, Stete of Michigan, State of Illinois and others
Defendant: United States of America, Eugene Scalia, Esq., Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Intervenor: American Lodging and Hotel Association, Associated Builders and Contractors, The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
Natl Assn of Home Builders, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 20-2414
Respondent: Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor
Petitioner: National Association of Home Builders, of the United States, Associated Builders and Contractors and Mason Contractors Association of America
National Association of Home B, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 19-3993
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, MASON CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?