Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Daniel Dydzak v. Edward Chen, et al
as 18-15674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD M. CHEN, PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, PETER LIND SHAW and others
Dydzak v. Chen et al
as 3:2017cv06843
Defendant:
Jeffrey L. Bleich, Carlos T. Bea, A. Wallace Tashima and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stafne v. Zilly et al
as 2:2017cv01692
Plaintiff:
Scott E Stafne
Defendant:
Thomas S Zilly, John C Coughenour, Barry G Silverman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cohea v. Melo
as 1:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
M Melo, Thelton E Henderson, John L. Noonan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohea v. Melo
as 4:2014cv04288
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
M. Melo, Thelton E. Henderson, John L. Noonan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritzenthaler et al v. Silverman et al
as 2:2014cv02068
Plaintiff:
Jane Anne Ritzenthaler and Richard Lyle Ritzenthaler
Defendant:
Barry G Silverman, Jay S Bybee, Morgan Christen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Anthony Williams v. UAL, Inc., et al
as 13-15299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UAL, INC., GLENN F. TILTON, WILLIAM KING, (Ron) and others
COHEA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01622
Plaintiff:
DANNY JAMES COHEA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, CONGRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Williams v. UAL, Inc., et al
as 12-16794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UAL, INC., GLENN F. TILTON, WILLIAM KING, (Ron) and others
Williams v. UAL, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03781
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Williams
Defendant:
UAL, Inc. , Glenn F. Tilton, William (Ron) King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
