Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,724
WILLIAMS v. GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff: HAMISH WILLIAMS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM A. JONES and HAMISH WILLIAMS
Defendant: GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC., INDUCTOTHERM CORPORATION, LINDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant: DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee: ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff: Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Michael Twombly v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10236
Defendant: Aurora Pump, Ford Motor Company, VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL and others
Cross Defendant: Crosby Valve, LLC, Crane Co., York International Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: General Electric Company, COPES VULCAN, INC., The Budd Company and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TWOMBLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILBUR TWOMBLY and Michael Twombly
3Rd Party Defendant: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Not Classified By Court: Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Josephine Banks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv06892
Plaintiff: Josephine Banks, Jamie Banks, Nuevoe Strain and others
Defendant: 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff: David Crooks
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Mohr v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06081
Plaintiff: Raymond Mohr
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Crown, Cork & Seal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Susan Rogers v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 22-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUSAN M. ROGERS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III, DECEASED, AND WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT
Defendant / Appellee: AO SMITH CORP, A W CHESTERTON INC, ALLEN BRADLEY CO and others
Defendant: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, BEAZER EAST INC, formerly known as KOPPERS, BROUDY SUPPLY and others
Ortman v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05042
Plaintiff: David Ortman
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
McInnis v. Hexcel Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01087
Plaintiff: LISA MCINNIS
Defendant: ADC CONTRACTING & SUPPLY, AEROQUIP, Allen Bradley Company and others
Cross Defendant: Hexcel Corporation, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and SIKORSKY HELICOPTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?