Cases 21 - 30 of 238
Barringer v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pasco County)
as 8:2022cv02462
Petitioner:
Jay Barringer
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barringer v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pasco County)
as 8:2022cv02214
Petitioner:
Jay Barringer
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARRINGER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
JAY BARRINGER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and MADISON CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARRINGER v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
JAY BARRINGER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fonseca v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2022cv01416
Plaintiff:
April Fonseca and April Ehrlich
Defendant:
City of Medford, Jackson County, James Barringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barringer v Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05646
Plaintiff:
Michael A Barringer, Sr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BARRINGER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15335
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL WAYNE BARRINGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Ryan v. DeMaria, et al
as 22-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES P. RYAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLO DEMARIA, JR., Mayor, City of Everett, JAMIE RUSSO, then-Director of Constituent Services, DEBRA J. BRETON, Past Attorney/Mortgage Broker and others
Defendant:
ROBERT GREENE, Suffolk County Assistant District Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
