Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Cheeks v. Carver
as 3:2022cv00692
Petitioner:
Thomas Allen Cheeks
Respondent:
Ben Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hebb v. City of Asheville, North Carolina et al
as 1:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Zachary Hebb
Defendant:
City of Asheville, North Carolina and Ben Woody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crump v. Carver et al
as 3:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ramar Dion Benjamin Crump
Defendant:
Ben Carver, Saint T. Tapp, David E. Cothron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Jimmy Ellis
as 3:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kierra-Michelle Parker
Defendant:
Ellis Jimmy, Mercedes Bens of South Atlanta and Jimmy Ellis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Howard v. Jaffa et al
as 3:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Howard, Jr.
Defendant:
Ben Jaffa, Jr., Graham Investment Company and Jay Realty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Coffee et al
as 1:2021cv00157
Defendant:
FNU Coffee, FNU Ingram and Ben Carver
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lever et al v. United Services Automobile Association
as 1:2021cv00117
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association
Plaintiff:
Dianne S. Lever and Ben R. Lever, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres v. Ishee, et al
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Mark Ervin, Greg Swink, FNU Bullis and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howald v. Ben Lippen School
as 1:2021cv00059
Plaintiff:
Rachel Howald
Defendant:
Ben Lippen School, Pamela Kaye Herrington and Columbia Bible College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilder v. US Attorney General et al
as 7:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Ben Stein, Oners of 201 - 414 North 11th Street Wilmington NC 28401, New Hanover County NC Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V. Wilder, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
