Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EBAY, INC.
as 1:2018mc00148
In Re:
SUBPOENA SERVED ON CLARK BENSEN AND POLIDATA LLC and EBAY, INC.
Interested Party:
SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
SUBPOENA SERVED ON CLARK BENSEN AND POLIDATA LLC et al v. BENSEN et al
as 1:2018mc00147
Petitioner:
TERESA THOBABEN, AARON DAGRES, KATHRYN DEITSCH and others
Respondent:
POLIDATA LLC and CLARK BENSEN
In Re:
SUBPOENA SERVED ON CLARK BENSEN AND POLIDATA LLC
Tokyo Gatson v. Benjamin Mininger, et al
as 16-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BENJAMIN E. MININGER, JORDAN BENSEN, CARLOS MORALES and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DILKES
Richard Eagans v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-20318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD RAY EAGANS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, TRACY BAILEY, TIFFANY BENSEN and others
Bensen v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00749
Plaintiff:
Patrick H. Bensen
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GATSON v. MININGER et al
as 2:2015cv08895
Plaintiff:
TOKYO GATSON
Defendant:
BENJAMIN E. MININGER, JORDAN BENSEN, CARLOS MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mikell v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv02919
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mikell
Defendant:
SA Benjamin E. Mininger, SA Jordan Bensen, SA Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv02331
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silverstein et al v. Thierer et al
as 1:2015cv04896
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Silverstein, Ross Weintraub and Booth Family Trust
Defendant:
Mark A. Thierer, Steven D. Cosler, Peter J. Bensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
