Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Morgan v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00726
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv01060
Petitioner:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Parmiter et al
as 9:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Brian Morgan
Defendant:
Cheryl Parmiter, Ryan Joseph Hutchings, C.O. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
United States of America, Attorney General of the State of Arkansas and Oklahoma County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. The United States et al
as 2:2022cv02032
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
The United States, Attorney General: State of Arkansas and Oklahoma County District Court, OKC, OK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Morgan v. Mallozzi
as 9:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Brian Morgan
Defendant:
Shelly Mollozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv01067
Plaintiff:
David Brian Morgan
Defendant:
United States of America, Kevin Stitt, Director DOC Scott Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. United States et al
as 5:2021cv01030
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Earnest Draper, Earnest Moncada and others
Respondent:
United States and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan v. US
as 21-2231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
