Cases 21 - 30 of 1,542
Branson et al v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 1:2023cv14329
Plaintiff:
Kerry Branson and Shelley Dotson
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Love et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leonard D. Love and Karen L. Morey
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, Robinson Insulation Company, Grogan Robinson Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jill Klein v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 23-1762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL KLEIN, deceased, by her Personal Representative, Brent Klein
Defendant / Appellee:
CATERPILLAR, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Opitz v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 1:2023cv04868
Plaintiff:
Eric Opitz
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance v. Caterpillar Inc et al
as 4:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc and Puck Custom Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MS Amlin Corporate Member LTD v. Floyd, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03253
Counter Defendant:
MS AMLIN CORPORATE MEMBER LTD
Defendant:
FLOYD, INC., UNITED MEDICAL ENTERPRISE, INC., ALSIP MINIMILL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Ducote et al v. Caterpillar Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ducote, Austin Ducote and Shelby Ducote
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc., Louisiana Machinery Co L L C and Caterpillar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
