Cases 21 - 30 of 37
MCK Millennium Centre Parking, LLC v. Central Parking System, Inc.
as 1:2010cv08295
Plaintiff:
MCK Millennium Centre Parking, LLC
Defendant:
Central Parking System, Inc.
Third_party_defendant:
The Residences at Millennium Centre Condominium Association
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Central Parking System, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Central Parking System, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
MCK Millennium Centre Parking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kari Sims v. Central Parking Systems Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01280
Defendant:
Central Parking Systems Inc and DOES
Plaintiff:
Kari Sims
Oscar Munoz v. Central Parking System, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06172
Defendant:
Central Parking System, Inc. and DOES
Plaintiff:
Oscar Munoz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cunningham v. Central Parking System Inc et al
as 3:2009cv03138
Plaintiff:
Myra C Cunningham
Defendant:
Central Parking System Inc, Central Parking System of South Carolina Inc, US General Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Roberts v. Central Parking System, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02462
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Roberts
Defendant:
Central Parking System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Central Parking System, Inc. v. Caldin
as 3:2009cv00952
Plaintiff:
Central Parking System, Inc.
Defendant:
Ralph L. Caldin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
