Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Byerly v. Bandit Task Force, et al.
as 1:2020cv00223
Defendant:
Ada County, Deann Hopla, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Stone et al
as 1:2020cv00186
Defendant:
Kayse Stone, Ada County, Terry Lakey and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Galloway v. Boise City Ada County Housing Authorities et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Boise City Ada County Housing Authorities, City of Boise and Ada County
Plaintiff:
Sharon Galloway
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Mendez v. City of Boise et al
as 1:2020cv00061
Defendant:
City of Boise Public Works Department, City of Boise, City of Boise Legal Department and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Mendez v. City of Boise, et al
as 19-35874
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLEE IRBY, JOSEPH HODGES, SCOTT B. MUIR, City of Boise Legal Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL MENDEZ
Rod Stucker v. State of Idaho, et al
as 19-35733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROD STUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ADA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
City of Boise City v. PerfectMind, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00298
Defendant:
PerfectMind, Inc.
Plaintiff:
City of Boise City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. City of Boise et al
as 1:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Heather Buchanan, Joseph Hodges, Shawn Steiger and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Boise v. Actavis LLC et al
as 1:2018op46289
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Boise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
