Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Jacob et al v. Reading, Blue Mountain and Northern Railroad Company et al
as 3:2020cv00087
Defendant:
International Paper Company and Reading, Blue Mountain and Northern Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Brent Jacob and Cari Jacob
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MIGNOGNA v. MARPLE NEWTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2019cv04842
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MARPLE NEWTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, 9 UN-KNOWN BOARD MEMBERS and others
Plaintiff:
JOANNE MIGNOGNA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMBRIDGE RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. EQT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv00754
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. THORINGTON, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, JIMMI SUE SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
CAMBRIDGE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
PERRONG v. SELLTEL INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Defendant:
DAVID CARY GARTENBERG, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, SELLTEL INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
VAZQUEZ et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv00392
Plaintiff:
BRENDA I. VAZQUEZ , CHRISTINE V. FARNSTROM , VERONICA GARCIA and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION , BAYER U.S. LLC , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CUPPETT v. RITE AID CORPORATION
as 3:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
CARY J. CUPPETT
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MIR v. BROD et al
as 2:2017cv04956
Plaintiff:
JEHAN ZEB MIR
Defendant:
BRUCE ALAN BROD, MARILYN J. HEINE, CHARLES A. CASTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DARREN MILLER and DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYBETH ANDERSON, MAX GOTTESMAN, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
