Cases 21 - 30 of 85
REED v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
JASON REED
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH, GEO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONDS v. HENDRIX et al
as 1:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BONDS
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, JENNIFER FARMER, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
MARQ HALL
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02862
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., SEVIER, K. GRINSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARTIS v. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE REVIEW BOARD CASE NUMBER (1448584) 21-R-4078 et al
as 1:2021cv02432
Plaintiff:
CECIL EUGENE ARTIS, JR.
Defendant:
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE REVIEW BOARD CASE NUMBER (1448584) 21-R-4078, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and D 54 I RGIS INVENTORY SPECIOALISTS (D 45)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
FRAZIER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv02445
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, MARK R. SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2021cv02324
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Defendant:
ASHLEY TAYLOR, ANDREW SICKMANN, MYRA STROBEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
JENKINS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2021cv00075
Defendant:
H. WILSON, MR. T. STEVENSON, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
CECIL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLES v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03204
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC., JANE DOE, H. WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
