Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Dillard v. Tanner et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Dillard, III
Defendant:
Dawn Lee Tanner, Dexter Payne, G Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
James Randy Scott
Defendant:
Sherwood Arkansas, City of, Stephen Cobb and Sheila Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Cobb et al v. Crawlspace Doctor of Arkansas LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Brailand Cobb and Ricky Tate
Defendant:
Crawlspace Doctor of Arkansas LLC and Ellis Lee Manuel, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Oliver v. Cobbs et al
as 4:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Mario Oliver
Defendant:
Mathew Cobbs, Sanders, Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Cobbs et al
as 4:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dashan Bailey
Defendant:
Cobbs, White and West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Cobb et al
as 4:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant:
Cobb, Belt, Phillp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Runion et al
as 2:2022cv02031
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Corporal Toon, Nurse Danelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Jordan et al
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Jordan, Ataway, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelsey v. Cobb et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Tony Kelsey
Defendant:
Mary Cobb, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
