Cases 21 - 30 of 244
Tirva et al v. Hilton Spencerport Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Donna Tirva, Leo Tirva, D.T. and others
Defendant:
Hilton Spencerport Express, Inc., Arrive Logistics, LLC, Graphic Packaging International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cole et al v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Lori Cole and Theodore Cole
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
COLES v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
SHERROD COLES
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JONES v. DWIGGINS et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Defendant:
LEEANN DWIGGINS, MADISON COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, JAKE BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE COLE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
COLE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00148
Petitioner:
STEPHEN COLE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CLINKENBEARD v. FCI TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CLINKENBEARD
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE, J BALLARD and COLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
COLE v. USA
as 1:2022cv02202
Petitioner:
MATTHEW LEVI COLE, SR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cole et al v. Crown Equipment Corporation
as 3:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cole and Selena Cole
Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
TAYLOR v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TAYLOR
Defendant:
T. THOMPSON, COLE and ZACHARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
