Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Hope #336676 v. Epstein et al
as 2:2019cv05271
Defendant:
Unknown Pearson, Sheldon Epstein, Corizon Health Care Services and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. SINGER et al
as 1:2019cv00138
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICE, W SINGER and L MOYE
Plaintiff:
VICTOR LAMAR ROGERS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. State of Missouri
as 1:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
Hosea L. Robinson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, SECC Corizon Health Care Services and SECC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Swajanen et al
as 2:2019cv00117
Defendant:
Unknown Eiseman, Unknown Ogel, Unknown Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coe v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 8:2019cv01338
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Corizon Health Care Services, Polk County Jail (South) and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine T. Coe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Hoffman-Prusi et al
as 2:2019cv00101
Defendant:
James Alexander, Unknown Durant, R. Horack and others
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Ryan
as 2:2019cv03399
Plaintiff:
Michael Roberts
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services Incorporated, John Modrzewski, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schlienz v. Ryan et al
as 3:2019cv08071
Defendant:
Richard Pratt, Corizon Health Care Services and Charles L Ryan
Plaintiff:
James Schlienz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilmer v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00080
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services and Charles L Ryan
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Wilmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services and Charles L Ryan
Plaintiff:
David Kirby Womack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
