Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Odom v. Sloughower et al
as 3:2017cv05800
Plaintiff:
Jamar Odom
Defendant:
Sloughower, Balderrama, A Valencia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casterlow-Bey v. Pierce County Sheriff et al
as 3:2017cv05723
Plaintiff:
Gary Casterlow-Bey
Defendant:
Pierce County Sheriff, Balderama, Brenda Crammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIGUEROA v. CRAMMER et al
as 5:2017cv03432
Plaintiff:
MARIO JESUS FIGUEROA
Defendant:
CRAMMER and DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson
as 3:2014cv04958
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Thuddy, F. Kreitler, L. W. Rohlfing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00310
Defendant:
BALLARD, BOOKER, BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gregory McKinney v. CDCR, et al
as 13-15770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MCKINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, S. CRAMMER, J. SOTO and others
Martin et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv02350
Plaintiff:
John Miller, Karen Holloway, Gerald Beamon and others
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., BMO Harris Bank, N.A., OneWest Bank, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gregory McKinney v. CDCR, et al
as 12-17832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MCKINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, S. CRAMMER, J. SOTO and others
Bruce Koklich v. James Yates, et al
as 11-17886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE KOKLICH
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden, P. MENDOZA, Correctional Officer, CHAMNESS, Correctional Officer and others
Ivan Davis v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 11-4001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN BLAIR DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, TAMMY CRAMMER, BOBBI A. MCCALLISTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
