Cases 21 - 30 of 120
Thomas v. Venegas, Star No. 9624 et al
as 1:2021cv04294
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas
Defendant:
Officer Pedro Venegas, Star No. 9624, Officer Juan Pintor, Star No. 6255 and Officer Daniel Sullivan, Star No. 855
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03004
Petitioner:
Daniel Sullivan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN et al v. M&S TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Defendant:
THE PEGGS COMPANY, INC., JOHN DOE #1, BEDROCK LOGISTICS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN and FRANCES SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hopper et al v. Chang et al
as 2:2020cv05727
Plaintiff:
John Hopper and Erica Hopper
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan and Sookyung Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81568
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92241
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv49085
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01817
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv00216
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sullivan
Traci Guns et al v. Stephen Riley et al
as 2:2020cv00270
Defendant:
Scott Griffin, Epic Rights, LLC, Kelly Nickels and others
Plaintiff:
Tracii Guns and Philip Lewis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
