Cases 21 - 30 of 246
BRIGGS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
DANNY K. BRIGGS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
ROBINSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
ALVIN D. ROBINSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and DANNY H. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
ALMOND v. USA
as 1:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
DANNY JOE ALMOND
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Parker v. USA
as 4:2023cv00044
Petitioner:
Dannie Simon Parker, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JONES v. USA
as 1:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
DANNY RAY JONES, SR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Horton et al v. Fussell
as 7:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Hugh Horton, Danny Fryar, Michael Fryar and others
Defendant:
Timothy Fussell
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Harris v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03416
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
FNU Cooper, FNU Gardner, FNU Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TRUESDALE v TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Adaesha Truesdale, ALFRED ALLISON, ALICIA BOWE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC, TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC, TMX Finance of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
MITCHELL v. PATTERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
TIM PATTERSON, JEFFREY, OFFICER BETHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00602
Petitioner:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Respondent:
DANNY ROGERS, D.W. COOKE, W.M. EVANS and others
Defendant:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
