Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marc Adams, et al v. General Motors LLC
as 20-56290
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JENKINS, TUAN BUI, WALTER GOETZMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARC ADAMS, ROBERT C. MURPHY, MIKE PETERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Estate of William D. Pilgrim, et al v. General Motors LLC
as 20-56073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN FERRER, MARC ADAMS, DEVRY DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Estate of William D. Pilgrim, et al v. General Motors LLC
as 20-80129
Petitioner:
ADAM BALDUCCI, JARED KILEY, DAVID WARD and others
Respondent:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
United States v. David Astin
as 20-2853
Defendant / Appellant:
David Ward Astin
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv72655
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54698
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of David Ward, by and through successor in interest, Ernestine Ward et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2020cv03400
Defendant:
Mark Essick, Charles Blount, County of Sonoma and others
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Ward and Estate of David Ward, by and through successor in interest, Ernestine Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv88974
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
