Cases 21 - 30 of 120
Leopoldo Cardenas v. Patricia Powers, et al
as 18-70085
Petitioner:
LEOPOLDO CARDENAS
Respondent:
PATRICIA POWERS and DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Royal Robinson v. Augustus Corbett, et al
as 17-11483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROYAL DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
AUGUSTUS CORBETT and STANLEY R. MAYS
Robinson v. Corbett et al
as 3:2017cv02931
Plaintiff:
Royal Douglas Robinson
Defendant:
Augustus Corbett and Stanley R Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 17-10331
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHANNON DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
McGowan v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2016cv01253
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. McGowan, Jr.
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, FNU Dietz, Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. JONES et al.
as 5:2016cv00065
Petitioner:
SHANNON DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Respondent:
JULIE L JONES and FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burnett et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2015cv09903
Plaintiff:
Luis Merino, Kimberly Franco, Mary Kaye Crenshaw and others
Defendant:
The National Iranian Gas Company and Catherine Stefani
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dana Asher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Gonzalez et al v. Heartland Express et al
as 5:2015cv00205
Plaintiff:
Catalina Gonzalez , Ashley Monreal and Darnley Bernardino
Defendant:
Heartland Express, Inc. and Charles Douglas Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Shannon Robinson
as 15-15380
Petitioner:
In re: SHANNON DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
US v. Parrilla
as 15-2403
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LYNDON J. PARRILLA
Interested Party:
WARREN ANGUS, STEPHEN BABIN, ARTHUR BALDWIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
