Cases 21 - 30 of 44
BNSF Railway Company v. Kansas Department of Revenue, State of Kansas
as 5:2014cv04046
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company , Cimmarron Valley Railroad, LC , Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Revenue, State of Kansas and David N. Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HARPER v. FLORIDA BAR et al
as 4:2013cv00459
Plaintiff:
DAVID A HARPER
Defendant:
JOANN MARIE STALCUP, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, FLORIDA BAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BNSF Railway Company et al v. Revenue, Secretary of the Kansas Department of et al
as 5:2013cv04063
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company , Cimarron Valley Railroad, LC , Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Revenue, Secretary of the Kansas Department of and David N. Harper
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503 Railroad Revitalization Regulatory Reform
Harper v. Harrison County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Harper
Defendant:
Harrison County Adult Detention Center, Health Assurance LLC and Correctional Medical Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Aiken
as 1:2013cv20398
Plaintiff:
William Brown , David M. Harper and Luly Nunez
Defendant:
Richard A. Aiken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Harper v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00990
Plaintiff:
David Lawrence Harper
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Harper et al v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 6:2012cv00966
Plaintiff:
Vera C. Harper and David A. Harper
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association, Alan Dickey, Nancy Alley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BNSF Railway Company et al v. Jordan et al
as 5:2012cv04069
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company , Cimarron Valley Railroad, LC , Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Nick Jordan and David N. Harper
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
