Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Long-Hampton et al v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00064
Defendant:
John Doe, #1-3, John Doe, #7-9, Walmart Stores and others
Plaintiff:
David Hampton, Marzetta Long-Hampton and David Rowland Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Young v. Jacob Levitan
as 19-5004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Rowland Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Jacob Levitan, Clerk of the United States Supreme Court
PALM et al v. BELL et al
as 2:2018cv04173
Defendant:
DAVID REED, BYRON HAYES, BUNDY TYPE WRITER & COMPUTER/GEEK SQUAD and others
Plaintiff:
COMPUTER NERDS INC. and JOHN EDWARD PALM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. BOOTH et al
as 2:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
J. KEVIN BOOTH , DAVID ROWLAND , GREGORY LANHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Banks v. Rowland et al
as 1:2016cv01326
Plaintiff:
Luther Banks, III
Defendant:
David Rowland, Richard Walker, Shane Cramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01155
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWLAND CONLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. FOX, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Rowland Young v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 5:2014cv02598
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, Lee, Unnamed CDCR Employees and others
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
David Rowland Manuel v. The People of the United States
as 2:2014cv08900
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Manuel
Defendant:
The People of the United States
CONLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01359
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWLAND CONLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. FOX, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Holman
as 3:2014cv01014
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Marcia A. Holman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
