Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Dunkle v. Carmack et al
as 8:2022cv02497
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Dunkle
Defendant:
N. Carmack, C. M. Fraccica, A. Sievers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunkle v. Pasco County Police Department et al
as 8:2022cv02368
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Dunkle
Defendant:
Pasco County Police Department, N. Carmack, T T Croker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. BISCOE et al
as 2:2022cv03310
Plaintiff:
WALTER HARRIS
Defendant:
MR. BISCOE, MICHAEL DUNKLE, WESLEY MATREY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Bernadette Mason, Charles Stetler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunkle v. Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00520
Petitioner:
David Dunkle
Respondent:
Warden of Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gnana Chinniah, et al v. East Pennsboro Township, et al
as 22-1043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GNANA M. CHINNIAH, also known as Gnanachandra M. Chinniah and SUGANTHINI CHINNIAH
Defendant / Appellee:
EAST PENNSBORO TOWNSHIP, JEFFREY S. SHULTZ, KAREN DUNKLE and others
Dunkle v. Armstrong et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Dunkle
Defendant:
Brian W. Armstrong, Landstar System, Inc., Landstar Ranger, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv01717
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Secretary John E. Wetzel, Superintendent Jamey P. Luther, Officer Harpster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNKLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60395
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DUNKLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
