Cases 21 - 30 of 19,554
Ethicon LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 21-1995
Appellee:
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.
Appellant:
ETHICON LLC
Pedraza-Melendez v. Ethicon Johnson & Johnson
as 3:2021cv01249
Defendant:
Ethicon Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon LLC. d/b/a Johnson & Johnson also known as Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC
Plaintiff:
Luis pedraza Pedraza-Melendez and Luis A. Pedraza-Melendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Terri Leith v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv00691
Plaintiff:
Donna Clark, Bonnie Crawford, Willie Morgan and others
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 500, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonnie Wilkinson v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 8:2021cv00625
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coonan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv10310
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Debra Coonan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Patricia H. Walker and Karen M. Hanna
Defendant:
ETHICON, LLC, ETHICON INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00526
Defendant:
ETHICON, LLC, ETHICON INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
Sherrilene Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00514
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Kennedy and Ramona Y. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ethicon LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 21-1601
Appellee:
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.
Appellant:
ETHICON LLC
Romero v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00074
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Linda Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
