Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GHASSAN et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01575
Plaintiff:
OMAR GHASSAN, OO, MO and others
Defendant:
Biden, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01256
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dhingra v. Esposito et al
as 3:2022cv02207
Defendant:
Eliina Stephenson, Charles Esposito, Eliina N. Belenkiy and others
Plaintiff:
Rakesh Dhingra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Henry v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
The State of Illinois, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Pierre Renoir v. Earl Barksdale, et al
as 21-6225
Petitioner / Appellant:
PIERRE A. RENOIR
Respondent / Appellee:
EARL R. BARKSDALE, Warden, KNOXVILLE FBI DIRECTOR and U.S. ATTORNEY, Knoxville, TN
GHASSAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2021cv03252
Plaintiff:
OMAR GHASSAN, MADIA OMAR, M. O. and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Engel v. FBI, et al
as 21-2373
Defendant / Appellee:
FBI Assistant Director, FBI Director, FBI Field Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
