Cases 21 - 30 of 883
Rodgers v. NVR Inc.-Ryan Homes et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Marcha L.M. Rodgers
Defendant:
NVR Inc.-Ryan Homes, Costner Law Office,PLLC, Kuester Management Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Kozak
as 23-2008
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB
Defendant / Appellant:
PEGGY J. KOZAK
McIvor v. Flagstar Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv10070
Plaintiff:
James McIvor
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Flagstar Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv10071
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Scott
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zung v. Flagstar Bank FSB
as 1:2023cv10178
Plaintiff:
Thomas Zung
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank FSB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Matarelli et al v. Mattamy Home Funding, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
Adam Callahan Matarelli and Denniza Colon
Defendant:
Mattamy Home Funding, LLC, Ginnie Mae, Flagstar Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022 Securities Fraud
Grabner v. Flagstar Bank, N.A.
as 4:2023cv04326
Plaintiff:
Brett Grabner
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Flagstar Bank, NA v. Degele et al
as 1:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Flagstar Bank, NA and Flagstar Bank, FSB
Defendant:
GREGORY W. DEGELE, Enfield Green Homeoners Association, Gregory Degele and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Flagstar Bank, N.A. v. Hometown Lenders, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv12858
Plaintiff:
Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Hometown Lenders, Inc. and William E. Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Scott v. Flagstar Bank, N.A.
as 4:2023cv12726
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Scott
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
