Cases 21 - 30 of 3,081
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Vidrio Fuentes v. Nurse Kelly et al
as 9:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Juan Felipe Vidrio Fuentes
Defendant:
Nurse Kelly and Captain Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rivera-Fuentes v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Yadlin Rivera Fuentes
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vidrio Fuentes v. USA
as 2:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Juan Felipe Vidrio Fuentes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fuentes v. Garland
as 24-1973
Petitioner:
LILIAN FUENTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Scott v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Larry S. Scott
Defendant:
Fuentes and Deangelo Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
