Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Mock v. Garland
as 23-10319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William T. Mock, Christopher Lewis, Firearms Policy Coalition, Incorporated, a nonprofit corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Texas, Brady Brown, Gun Owners of America, Incorporated and others
State of Texas et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS, Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Steven M Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Barnett et al v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Caleb Barnett, Brian Norman, Hoods Guns & More and others
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Brendan F. Kelly, James Gomric and others
Amicus Curiae:
Illinois Sheriffs Association, Everytown for Gun Safety and Second Amendment Law Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, Guns Save Life, Gun Owners of America and others
Defendant:
Jay Robert Pritzker, Kwame Raoul and Brendan F Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. and GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Williams et al v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Sara Beth Williams, Bruce Kane, Jason Yepko and others
Defendant:
Garry L McFadden, Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office and Josh Stein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc. et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc., Brad Lohrey, Adam Johnson and others
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown and Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oregon State Shooting Association, Mazama Sporting Goods, Tim Freeman and others
Amicus Curiae:
Oregon Hunters Association, Gun Owners of America Inc., Gun Owners Foundation and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Terri Davie and Ellen F Rosenblum
Intervenor Defendant:
Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2022cv03379
Plaintiff:
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. and GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State of Arizona, et al v. Bureau of ATF, et al
as 22-2854
Plaintiff:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bridge City Ordinance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Arizona, State of West Virginia, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Director, Steven M. Dettelbach (formerly Gary M. Restaino)
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, et al v. Bureau of ATF, et al
as 22-2812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bridge City Ordinance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of West Virginia, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Director, Steven M. Dettelbach (formerly Gary M. Restaino)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
