Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Macon v. Unknown
as 2:2021cv00395
Plaintiff:
Garrett Macon
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogunjobi v. Northam, et al.
as 3:2021cv00392
Defendant:
William A. Garrett, Mark Herring, J. Brandon Bell, II and others
Plaintiff:
Adesijuola Ogunjobi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jason v. Robinson et al
as 7:2021cv00320
Defendant:
Claim #6 Participants, Abstraction Team, Stallard and others
Plaintiff:
Hubert Alan Jason, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2020cv00986
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, Steve Herrick, Officer Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis J. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Brown et al
as 7:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Stacy Y. Brown, T. Doe Blankenship, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hiawatha Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Central Mutual Insurance Company v. Garrett et al
as 6:2020cv00061
Defendant:
Landon Cortez Parks, Carter Elizabeth Garrett and Haulers Insurance Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Central Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Garrett v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00930
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Valentina Garrett
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Garrett v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 7:2020cv00475
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP a Delaware limited partnership doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter
Plaintiff:
Debra Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raiford v. Branch et al
as 1:2020cv00687
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Garrett and Lieuteant Branch
Plaintiff:
Thomas Raiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
