Cases 21 - 30 of 542
GILMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03424
Plaintiff:
CASSIUS GILMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Diaz-Jaramillo
as 23-1764
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GILMER DIAZ-JARAMILLO, a/k/a Gilmer Diaz-Jamillo
US v. Diaz-Jaramillo
as 23-1756
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GILMER DIAZ-JARAMILLO, a/k/a Gilmer Diaz-Jamillo
ALEXANDER et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ALEXANDER, MICHAEL WAYNE ALLEN, ALAN ALSOP and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alexander et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
Melissa Alexander, Michael Wayne Allen, Alan Alsop and others
Defendant:
3M Company
McNulty v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Jayson McNulty
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Leveke v. Maricopa County Sheriff et al
as 3:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Cody Ray Leveke
Respondent:
Maricopa County Sheriff and Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BAUTISTA et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
as 0:2021cv61749
Plaintiff:
GILMER BAUTISTA, JUAN MENDOZA, HILDA MENDOZA and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Strickland v. Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Kevin Strickland
Defendant:
Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners, Mark Tolbert, Cathy Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hearne et al
as 4:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Lewis Smith, III
Defendant:
Matthew Hill Hearne and Joan Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
