Cases 21 - 30 of 999
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Rodriguez v. Board of County Commissioners of Logan County, Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Logan County, Colorado, Brett Powell, Logan County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ubera v. C.G.C.G., Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo C. Hernandez Ubera
Defendant:
C.G.C.G., Inc., Chris Pontikis, Alexandra Pontikis and others
Castillo v. Borla et al
as 5:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Castillo
Defendant:
Edward Borla, Derek Lauritzen, Eric Bridgnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barandica v. Advanced Pediatrics P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Niset Barandica
Defendant:
Advanced Pediatrics P.C., Yolanda Sabogal, Gonzalo Sabogal and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalo Villasana, Sr.In re: Gonzalo Villasana, Sr.
as 23-40690
Petitioner:
In re: Gonzalo Lavie Villasana, Sr.
Corpus v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 5:2023cv01478
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Corpus
Respondent:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14532
Plaintiff:
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Gary Palmer, Gaurav Jha and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Villa-Camacho v. Garland
as 23-6104
Petitioner:
CESAR GONZALO VILLA-CAMACHO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villa-Camacho v. Garland
as 23-7226
Petitioner:
CESAR GONZALO VILLA-CAMACHO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
