Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 42
PETA v. Joshua Stein
as 17-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS and others
Amicus Curiae: WTVD TELEVISION, LLC, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: CAROL L. FOLT, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., ET AL. V STEIN, ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. , ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND , CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY and others
Defendant: ROY COOPER and CAROL L. FOLT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALDF, et al v. Lawrence Wasden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-35960
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF IDAHO and others
Defendant - Appellant: LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Idaho
Amicus Curiae: PLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATION, IDAHO BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, FOOD LAW & POLICY SCHOLARS and others
FOOD & WATER WATCH, INC. et al v. VILSACK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01547
Plaintiff: FOOD & WATER WATCH, INC. , MARGARET SOWERWINE and JANE FORAN
Defendant: THOMAS J. VILSACK , BRIAN RONHOLM , ALFRED V. ALMANZA and others
Movant: GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT , CENTER FOR FOODBORNE ILLNESS , CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT v. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01954
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
Defendant: FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Hedges v. Obama
as 12-3644
Defendant / Appellant: Leon E. Panetta, individually and in his capacity as the executive and representative of the Department of Defense and Barack Hussein Obama, individually and as representative of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae: Laurel Dee Yasui, Iris Yasui, Sharon Mitsu Yuen and others
Petitioner: Lindsey Graham, American Civil Liberties Union, John McCain and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Christopher Hedges
Hedges v. Obama
as 12-3176
Defendant / Appellant: Leon E. Panetta, individually and in his capacity as the executive and representative of the Department of Defense and Barack Hussein Obama, individually and as representative of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae: Laurel Dee Yasui, Iris Yasui, Sharon Mitsu Yuen and others
Petitioner: American Civil Liberties Union
Plaintiff / Appellee: Christopher Hedges
Hurt et al v. The Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2011cv02531
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hurt, Government Accountability Project and The American People
Defendant: The Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Constitution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00342
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ACLU v. Fernando Galindo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2086
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, OMB WATCH and GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee: FERNANDO GALINDO, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Court in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Amicus Supporting Appellee: TAXPAYERS AGAINST FRAUD EDUCATION FUND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?