Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Chatman v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company et al
as 2:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Renzenberger, Inc., Alysha Guy, Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company and others
Plaintiff:
James Chatman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
AHMED v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv00593
Defendant:
DAVID BREWER, R. EISELE, GUY PAGLI and others
Plaintiff:
FAROOQUE AHMED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02805
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
GUY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guy v. Neal et al
as 3:2020cv00661
Defendant:
McCormic, Ron Neal, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Dante Guy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIGHTSEY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01921
Plaintiff:
GUY LIGHTSEY
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guy v. Wexford Medical Staff et al
as 3:2020cv00536
Plaintiff:
Dante Guy and Dante D Guy
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Wexford Medical Staff, Susanna Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Leonard et al
as 3:2020cv00509
Plaintiff:
Dante Guy and Dante D Guy
Defendant:
Ron Neal and B Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUY v. BROWN et al
as 1:2020cv01169
Plaintiff:
DANTE GUY and DANTE D. GUY
Defendant:
JANE DOE, RICHARD BROWN, OFFICER #1 JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATURAL PACK, INC. et al v. SYNDICATE SALES, INC, et al
as 1:2020cv00219
Defendant:
SYNDICATE SALES, INC., DOES 1-10, THOMAS C LUNSFORD and others
Plaintiff:
NATURAL PACK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Guy v. Brown et al
as 3:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Dante Guy and Dante D Guy
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Richard Brown, John Doe and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
